Recent Motoring Law Case Results:

Posted on by Alison Ashworth

Ashworth Motoring Law provides specialist representation to drivers who have been accused of committing a motoring offence. Below is a selection of the successful outcomes (not guilty verdicts) we have secured for our clients in the most popular offence categories. All motoring law case results are anonymised to protect client confidentiality.

This page is updated regularly as further cases conclude.

Drug Driving Results:

  • R v S – Ipswich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v S – Basingstoke Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v H – Telford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v H – Crewe Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v S – Kings Lynn Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v H – Crewe Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v H – Portsmouth Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving), and driving without insurance
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v H – Brighton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v S – Ipswich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v G – Basingstoke Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v T – Kidderminster Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v U – Luton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving), and driving without insurance
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v B – Staines Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v H – Staines Magistrates Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v N – Oxford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v D – High Wycombe Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v T– Reading Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v G– Norwich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v F– Brighton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v W– Ipswich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v I– Newton Aycliffe Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v T– Nottingham Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v S– Norwich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving), using a mobile phone whilst driving, and going through a red light
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v L– Manchester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v G– Barnsley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v F– Kidderminster Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v A– Ipswich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v P– Leicester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving) and driving without due care and attention
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v G– Aldershot Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v G– Southampton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v W– Nottingham Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v B– Wigan Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving) and possession of drugs
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v C– Stockport Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v B– Kirklees Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v L– Exeter Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v P– Portsmouth Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v S– Exeter Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v P– Llandudno Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v G– Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v B– Burnley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v S– Bristol Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v W– Liverpool Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v D– Great Yarmouth Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v D– Oxford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v G– Norwich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v M– Staines Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v P– Staines Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v N– Southend Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v B– Llanelli Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v G– Norwich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v T– York Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v G– Norwich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v M– Basingstoke Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v M– Chelmsford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v G– Norwich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v B– Telford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v A– Staines Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v G– Norwich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v W– Caernarfon Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v H– Margate Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v A– Cirencester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v G– Norwich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v T– Newport Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v B– Workington Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving) and driving without due care and attention
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v B– Milton Keynes Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v W– Teesside Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v T– Crewe Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving) and possession of drugs
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v B– Blackburn Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v P– Bromley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v A– Cheltenham Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v P– Sevenoaks Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v M– Southampton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v B– Worthing Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v G– Yeovil Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v B– Guilford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v W– Plymouth Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v C– Wellingborough Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v O– Bromley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v Q– Highbury Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v G– Norwich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit (drug driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.

Drink Driving Results:

  • R v W– Lancaster Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v A– Taunton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v N– Taunton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v B– Chelmsford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v B– Brighton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v K– Chester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v J– Staines Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving), failure to stop, possession of drugs
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v R– Tameside Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v M– St Albans Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v H– Exeter Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v K– Chester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v A– Newcastle Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v K– Chester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v W– Oxford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v S– Burnley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v K– Medway Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v S– Doncaster Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v O– Warrington Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v B– Harrogate Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v S– Great Yarmouth Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v C– Colchester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v H– Aldershot Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v C– Liverpool Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v P– Leicester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v B – Manchester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v R– Reading Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v C – Liverpool Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving with excess alcohol (drink driving)
  • Result: Not Guilty.

Failure to Provide a Specimen Case Results:

  • R v K– Kings Lynn Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failure to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v M– Manchester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v H– Staines Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v H– Staines Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v D– Sefton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v R– St Albans Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v H– Brighton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v H– Staines Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v T– Walsall Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v C– Exeter Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v P– Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v R– Caernarfon Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v S– Portsmouth Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v L– Stevenage Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v B– Stevenage Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v H– Staines Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v S– Romford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v S– Nottingham Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v D– Swansea Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen and being drunk and disorderly
  • Result: Not Guilty.
  • R v A– Burnley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to provide a specimen
  • Result: Not Guilty.

NB: We have used the classification of Not Guilty to include all outcomes where the case was withdrawn or discontinued prior to trial, where no evidence was offered by the CPS at trial, and where our client was acquitted after trial. All of the above outcomes avoided the criminal conviction and driving disqualification for our clients.

Totting Up (Exceptional Hardship) Case Results:

  • R v W – Wellingborough Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a mobile phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Carlisle Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v J – Colchester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v D – Wilsden Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v A – Plymouth Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Wrexham Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a Mobile Phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Uxbridge Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a Mobile Phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v P – Worcester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v F – Wellingborough Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v T – Harrogate Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v R – Bradford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v C – Ipswich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v L – Cambridge Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Bexley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification reduced to 2 months, licence wiped clean of points
  • R v W – Colchester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v J – Peterlee Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding & Failing to furnish information
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v T – Ipswich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Staines Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving without due care and attention
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v H – Bexley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v G – Colchester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v P – Hull Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v C – Harrogate Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v T – Plymouth Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v G – Colchester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v J – Northampton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Stratford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Crawley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v S – Staines Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification reduced to 3 months, licence wiped clean of points
  • R v W – Cwmbran Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to furnish information
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Liverpool Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Aylesbury Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted
  • R v H – Bexley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v S – Leamington Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v D – Wellingborough Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v N – Bodmin Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Newcastle Under Lyme Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v T – Bradford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v I – Oxford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v E – Crawley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v E – Basildon Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Peterborough Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Mold Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v C – Barnstaple Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v H – Leamington Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted, disqualification avoided
  • R v L – Bexley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v P – Cheltenham Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v D – Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a mobile phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v S – St Albans Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: No Insurance
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v L – Bolton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v P – Nottingham Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v N – Derby Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a mobile phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v H – Weymouth Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Peterborough Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v C – St Albans Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v O – Guildford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v D – Leamington Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Carlisle Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification reduced to 28 days, licence wiped clean of points
  • R v R – Leamington Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: No Insurance – appeal against sentence
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v H – Harrogate Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v T – Chester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v R – Worcester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a Mobile Phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v P – Crawley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Allegation of No Insurance
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v E – Basildon Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding & No Insurance
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v G – Nottingham Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v G – Wellingborough Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Aldershot Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Bromley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v R – Horsham Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Lavender Hill Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – London Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a Mobile Phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Leamington Spa Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Maidstone Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: No Insurance
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v D – Leamington Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v S – Basildon Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding & Fail to furnish information
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v P – Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v T – Bath Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v S – Taunton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v P – Bradford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v K – Gateshead Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Grimsby Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v L – Lavender Hill Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a mobile phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v F – Birmingham Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a mobile phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Crawley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding & No seat belt
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v R – Southampton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v C – Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: No Insurance
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Bodmin Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v P – Bodmin Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v C – Worcester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v C – Cheltenham Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v T – Cheltenham Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a Mobile Phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v S – Weymouth Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v N – Chelmsford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving on the hard shoulder
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Basildon Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to Furnish Information
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Colchester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a mobile phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Mold Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v H – Chester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding & Fail to Furnish
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v C – Norwich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v L – Harrogate Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v H – Staines Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a Mobile Phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v C – Sheffield Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Cambridge Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v H – Southampton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: No Insurance
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Harrogate Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Chester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Fail to Furnish
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v C – Harrogate Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v E – Sheffield Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v S – Guildford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v C – High Wycombe Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Harrogate Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Walsall Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving without a valid licence, driving without insurance and speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v E – Great Yarmouth Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v R – Southampton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a mobile phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v F – Bodmin Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v L – Hull Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted
  • R v P – Grimsby Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v K – Great Yarmouth Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: No Insurance
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Weston Super Mare Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v T – Bradford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding – disqualified in absence
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v K – Lavender Hill Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v S – Barnstaple Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: No Insurance
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v E – Willesden Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a mobile phone whilst driving
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v R – Lavender Hill Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v G – Birmingham Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Fail to stop and report
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Bath Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Guildford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: No insurance
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to furnish
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Willesden Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v U – Bromley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a mobile phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v E – Blackburn Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to Furnish Information and Driving whilst Disqualified
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v R – Norwich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v D – Southend Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding & Driving without due care and attention
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v S – Guildford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v H – Wrexham Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Grimsby Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Taunton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Norwich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Wrexham Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v A – Sheffield Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v L – Lavender Hill Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v L – Medway Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v D – Aldershot Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: No insurance
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Wellingborough Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to Furnish
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Guildford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v C – Southampton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Swansea Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v G – Aldershot Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving without due care and attention
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Bath Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Stratford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Careless Driving and Failing to Stop and Report an Accident
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Chester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v D – Sheffield Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – York Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Appeal – Allegation of Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Hull Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v C – Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v S – Kingston-upon-Thames Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v S – Manchester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v D – Tiverton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Wellingborough Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v K – Harrogate Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Fail to furnish
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v S – Stoke-on-Trent Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v F – Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v J – Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Brighton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Bodmin Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v L – Lavender Hill Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – St Albans Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Exeter Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a mobile phone whilst driving
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v O – High Wycombe Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding & Fail to furnish
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v D – Folkestone Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v C – Southend Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a mobile phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v T – Wigan & Leigh Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v T – Peterlee Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Fail to furnish
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v C – Colchester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding and fail to furnish
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v C – Lavender Hill Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v L – High Wycombe Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: No Insurance
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v D – Plymouth Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Bath Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v D – Wycombe Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Blackpool Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Fail to furnish
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v P – Mold Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – York Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v G – Bridlington Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v D – Tameside Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Colchester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v N – Crawley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v V – Ipswich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v R – Peterborough Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v H – Lavender Hill Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving without due care & attention
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v T – Sunderland Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v J – Medway Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failure to furnish
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Taunton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a mobile phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Staines Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v P – Bath Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Fail to furnish
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Bridlington Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding & Fail to furnish
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v A – Folkestone Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v S – Aldershot Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v Z – Luton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v S – Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v G – Bexley Heath Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v H – Loughborough Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – High Wycombe Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v S – Bath Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Bath Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v S – Brighton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v R – York Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v G – Bromley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Redditch Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v J – Barnstaple Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v G – Bath Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v A – Bromley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v R – Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Stopping on a slip road
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v T – High Wycombe Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v A – High Wycombe Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failure to furnish
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Harrogate Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v N – Blackpool Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v K – Oxford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Aldershot Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v N – Bradford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v E – Warrington Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: No Insurance
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v E – High Wycombe Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Sheffield Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v P – Oxford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Telford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v F – Ipswich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: No insurance
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification reduced to 14 days, licence wiped clean of points
  • R v T – Folkestone Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification reduced to 14 days, licence wiped clean of points
  • R v H – Crawley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Stevenage Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification reduced to 3 months. Licence wiped clean of points
  • R v H – Chelmsford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding & Using a mobile phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Reading Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding – Appeal
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v D – Brighton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v O – Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v A – Guildford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v T – Northampton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v Y – Luton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a mobile phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Aldershot Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Wirral Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v C – Reading Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v F – Norwich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a mobile phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v W – Birkenhead Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v Z – Luton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v D – Peterlee Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Carlisle Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v Y – Bromley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: No Insurance
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v D – Norwich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v M – Sevenoaks Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v O – Crawley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failure to comply with a sign
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v D – Gateshead Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v H – Stevenage Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v D – Swansea Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failure to furnish
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Using a Mobile Phone
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided
  • R v B – Hull Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to Furnish & Speeding
  • Result: Exceptional hardship granted; disqualification avoided

New Driver – Avoiding Licence Revocation Results:

  • R v H – Birmingham Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Worn tread on tyres x 2
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v L – Cwmbran Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v W – Willesden Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v E – Carlisle Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v J – Dudley Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Drink Driving & No Insurance
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v B – Exeter Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: No Insurance
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v U – Luton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Drug Driving & No Insurance
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v B – Cheltenham Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Drunk in charge
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v C – Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v B – Manchester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Failing to furnish information
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v C – Wellingborough Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v P – Peterlee Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: No Insurance
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v G – Basildon Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v J – Northampton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v C – Guildford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v L – Leamington Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v W – Bath Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v M – Stevenage Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: No Insurance
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v F – Teesside Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v B – Peterlee Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: No Insurance
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v D – Blackburn Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving without due care and attention
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v E – Sevenoaks Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v B – Stratford Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v J – Kings Lynn Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v H – Weymouth Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Driving without due care and attention
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v V – Luton Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: No insurance
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v H – Worcester Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v T – Southend Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v S – Preston Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v T – Newport Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v B – Norwich Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Speeding
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided
  • R v D – Weston Super Mare Magistrates’ Court
  • Allegation: Fail to furnish
  • Result: Licence Revocation Avoided

Specialist Representation When The Outcome Matters:

A motoring allegation can place your driving licence, employment and reputation at risk. Early specialist advice can make all the difference. We examine the prosecution evidence carefully, identify any legal or evidential issues and provide clear advice on the available options.

These results demonstrate the care, preparation and specialist knowledge we bring to every instruction.

If you are under investigation, have received a postal requisition or have been charged with a motoring offence and are facing a driving ban, contact Ashworth Motoring Law on 0330 33 22 770 as soon as possible. Early instruction allows adequate time for proper preparation, and in our experience, preparation is almost always the deciding factor in the success of a case. We are here to help you understand your position and to give you the very best opportunity of avoiding a driving ban. We offer fixed fees, so contact us as soon as possible on 0330 33 22 770; the earlier we are involved, the more we can do.